General

McDonald v. The Floridian et al.; DiStasio v. Massachusetts

302 U.S. 683·Supreme Court of the United States·1937

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

No. 60. No. 360. McDonald v. The Floridian et al. DiStasio v. Massachusetts. October 11, 1937. Mr. John P. Hannon for petitioners, and Messrs. Wallace McCamant and W. Lair Thompson for respondents, in No. 60. Mr. Frank DiStasio, pro se, and Mr. James J. Ronan for respondent, in No. 360. [MAJORITY] Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; and Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court in and for the. County of Middlesex, Massachusetts. The motions for leave to proceed on typewritten petitions and records are denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted finds no grounds upon which writs of certiorari should be issued. The petitions for writs of certiorari are therefore also denied. Reported below: No. 60, 88 F. (2d) 289; No. 360, 8 N. E. (2d) 923.