Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hill v. United States, 1961 — 365 U.S. 841 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Hill v. United States
365 U.S. 841·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 178,
Misc.
Hill v. United States.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to .proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted limited to the question of whether petitioner may raise his claim under Federal Criminal Rule 32 (a) in the proceeding which he has now brought. Case transferred to the appellate docket. It is ordered that Curtis R. Reitz, Esquire, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.