Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elmore D. McInroy, an Infant, by William D. McInroy, his Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. David Stevenson Brewing Company, Appellant, 1901 — 165 N.Y. 663 · caselaw · US
General
Elmore D. McInroy, an Infant, by William D. McInroy, his Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. David Stevenson Brewing Company, Appellant
165 N.Y. 663·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elmore D. McInroy, an Infant, by William D. McInroy, his Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. David Stevenson Brewing Company, Appellant.
McInroy v. Stevenson Brewing Co., 40 App. Div. 618, affirmed.
(Argued January 21, 1901;
decided February 8, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 10, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Eugene Lamb Rickards, Jr., for appellant.
Ernest M. Welch for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.