General
STONE AND STONE PENSION PLAN ET AL. v. PATRICIA MCKENNA ET AL.
40 Conn. App. 936·Connecticut Appellate Court·1996·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
STONE AND STONE PENSION PLAN ET AL. v. PATRICIA MCKENNA ET AL.
(14399)
Landau, Schaller and Hennessy, Js.
Argued February 15
decision released, March 12, 1996
Ahmed A. Dadi, pro se, with whom was Patricia McKenna, pro se, the appellants (defendants).
David M. ReiUy, with whom, on the brief, was Francis J. Doherty, for the appellees (plaintiffs).
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.