Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Company et al., Petitioners, v. Mrs. Bessie Schinnerrer; and Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. et al., Petitioners, v. Mrs. Emma Hurst, 1912 — 226 U.S. 608 · caselaw · US
General
The Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Company et al., Petitioners, v. Mrs. Bessie Schinnerrer; and Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. et al., Petitioners, v. Mrs. Emma Hurst
226 U.S. 608·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 832.
No. 833.
The Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Company et al., Petitioners, v. Mrs. Bessie Schinnerrer; and Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. et al., Petitioners, v. Mrs. Emma Hurst.
November 4, 1912.
Mr. Frank S. Masten, Mr: Charles M. Johnson, Mr. R. P. Cary and Mr: Charles H. Stephens for the petitioners.
Mr. F. Zimmerman the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to. the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.