Conway's Executors v. Sherron

Conway’s Executors v. Sherron. The taking possession, and cultivating of the land by the vendee, takes the sale out of the Statute of Erauds. Bill in equity by the executors of the vendor for a specific execution of a sale of land at auction; averring part performance. Plea, Statute of Frauds. Mr. E. J. Lee, for the plaintiffs, contended — 1st. That the statute does not apply to goods sold at auction; and that there is no reason for a difference between lands and goods in that respect It is not necessary that the auctioneer’s authority should be in writing. Sugden, Law of Vendors, 57; Simon v. Motivos, 3 Burr. 1921; S. C., W. Bl. 599; Payne v. Cave, 3 T. E, 148; Trecolhiclc v. Coles, 9 Ves. 234, 249; Powell on Contracts, 272; Waller v. Hender & Cox, 5 Viner, 524. The auctioneer is a public officer, like a sheriff or a master in chancery, &c. Law of Virginia, December 22d, 1796; Bibb v. Duvall, 3 Call’s Rep. 362. 2d. That the agreement was executed in part by the plaintiffs’ suffering the defendant to take possession and enjoy the rents and profits, «fee., which takes the case out of the statute. Bell v. Andrews, 4 Dal. 152 ; Sugden, 72 ; 1 Vernon, 363 ; 1 Vez. 220, 297; 4 Ves. Jr. 720, and Argenbright v. Campbell, 3 Hen. & Mun. 161. [MAJORITY — The Court] The Court (Fitzhugh, J., not sitting,) overruled the plea, on the ground of part execution of the agreement; and at November term, 1814, upon final hearing, decreed a specific performance.