General
Dmitrovsky Bros., Inc., et al. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 347·United States Customs Court·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 60997.
protests 974974-G, etc. (New York).
Dmitrovsky Bros., Inc., et al. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Wilson, J.]
Opinion by
Wilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
[DISSENT — Mollison, J.,]
Mollison, J.,
dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, supra.