Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Missouri v. Iowa, 1939 — 308 U.S. 517 · caselaw · US
General
Missouri v. Iowa
308 U.S. 517·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 12,
original.
Missouri v. Iowa.
November 13, 1939.
Messrs. Roy McKittrick, Attorney General of Missouri, Frank W. Hayes, Assistant Attorney General, M. E. Casey, and Mrs. Ruth L. Waltner for complainant. Messrs. Fred D. Everett, Attorney General of Iowa, and Horace E. Pike, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant.
[MAJORITY]
The counsel for the respective parties to the above-entitled cause having stipulated and agreed that this cause has been fully settled and compromised and that it shall be dismissed and have filed a stipulation to that effect,
It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Bill of Complaint in this cause be, and it hereby is, dismissed, and that the costs, including the compensation of the Special Master, shall be divided equally between the parties.