Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Peter Marshall, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, 1918 — 246 U.S. 678 · caselaw · US
General
Peter Marshall, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company
246 U.S. 678·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 229.
Peter Marshall, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota.
March 18, 1918.
Mr. Harlan E. Leach for plaintiff in error.
Mr. McNeil V. Seymour for defendant in érror.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.