Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Petitioner, v. Mark B. Hamble, 1910 — 217 U.S. 604 · caselaw · US
General
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Petitioner, v. Mark B. Hamble
217 U.S. 604·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 884.
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Petitioner, v. Mark B. Hamble.
April 25, 1910.
Mr. Robert Dunlap, Mr. T. J. Norton, Mr. Edward W. Camp and Mr. Gardiner Lathrop for the petitioner.
Mr. Paul Sleman for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States' Circuit- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.