Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Atherton et al. v. United States; and Edwards et al. v. United States, 1950 — 338 U.S. 938 · caselaw · US
General
Atherton et al. v. United States; and Edwards et al. v. United States
338 U.S. 938·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 159, Misc.
No. 160, Misc.
Atherton et al. v. United States; and Edwards et al. v. United States.
A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioners. Solicitor General Pearlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, John R. Benney, Robert S. Erdahl and Harold D. Cohen for the United States. Briefs of amici curiae supporting the petition were filed by Arthur J. Goldberg for the Congress of Industrial Organizations, and Robert R. Rissman for Warmer et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.