Contracts · MBE-tested

McGrath, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Nagano

342 U.S. 91696 L. Ed. 2d 685·Supreme Court of the United States·1952

Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

January 28, 1952. No. 169. McGrath, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Nagano. Argued November 29, 1951. Decided January 28, 1952. James D. Hill argued the cause fdr petitioner. With him on the brief.were Solicitor General. Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baynton, George B. Searls and Irwin A. Seibel. Edward R. Johnston argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam:] Per Curiam: The .judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.