Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clarence B. Conger, Appellant, v. Wolsey T. Weyant et al., Respondents, 1892 — 132 N.Y. 578 · caselaw · US
General
Clarence B. Conger, Appellant, v. Wolsey T. Weyant et al., Respondents
132 N.Y. 578·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clarence B. Conger, Appellant, v. Wolsey T. Weyant et al., Respondents.
fArgued March 7, 1898;
decided March 22, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 9, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Irvtng Brown for appellant.
George W. Weyant for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion in Conger v. Treadway (ante, page 263).
All concur, except Brown, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.