Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cleary v. Bolger, 1962 — 371 U.S. 805 · caselaw · US
General
Cleary v. Bolger
371 U.S. 805·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 57.
Cleary v. Bolger.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 368 U. S. 984, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motion of respondent for the appointment of counsel is granted, and it is ordered that Joseph Aron-stein, Esquire, of New York, New York, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.