General
Helios-Upton Company, Respondent, v. Orlando F. Thomas et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another
184 N.Y. 585·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Helios-Upton Company, Respondent, v. Orlando F. Thomas et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
Helios-Upton Co. v. Thomas, 96 App. Div. 401, affirmed.
(Argued March 12, 1906;
decided March 27, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 15, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Richard A. Irving for appellants.
Herbert G. Smyth and Millard F. Tompkins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, Edwabd T. Babtlett, Haight, Vann, Willabd Babtlett and Chase, JJ.