General
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND et al., Petitioners, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION, DARRAHL FRANKLIN STOCK, a Minor, et al., Respondents
3 Cal. App. 2d 756·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1935·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 10031.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
January 17, 1935.]
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND et al., Petitioners, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION, DARRAHL FRANKLIN STOCK, a Minor, et al., Respondents.
F. Britton McConnell for Petitioners.
Everett A. Corten and Emmet J. Seawell for Respondents.
[MAJORITY — SCOTT, J., pro tem.]
SCOTT, J., pro tem.
Respondent Stock was given a relief work order by respondent county and while working thereunder was injured. The essential facts are the same as in the case of State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. et al., Civil No. 10030 (ante, p. 665 [40 Pac. (2d) 277]), this day decided, and the same rule should apply as to the award.
Award annulled.
Stephens, P. J., and Crail, J., concurred.