Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles H. Davids, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 526 · caselaw · US
General
Charles H. Davids, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent
182 N.Y. 526·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles H. Davids, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued June 2, 1905;
decided June 16, 1905.)
Davids v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 104 App. Div. 23, affirmed.
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered. April 21, 1905, which reversed an order of the Kings County Court vacating an execution in the above-entitled action.
The following question was certified :
“ May an execution against the person issue on the judgment recovered herein?”
Robert Stewart, Thomas F. Magner and Donald B. Smith for appellant.
Darius A. Marsh and George D. Yeomans for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below, and question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.