Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isaac M. Swasey, Appellant, v. Mary A. Berger, Respondent, 1890 — 125 N.Y. 677 · caselaw · US
Administrative
Isaac M. Swasey, Appellant, v. Mary A. Berger, Respondent
125 N.Y. 677·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isaac M. Swasey, Appellant, v. Mary A. Berger, Respondent.
(Argued October 27, 1890;
decided December 2, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 15, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee.
This action was brought to recover for services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff, a physician, upon employry.ent as an expert by defendant in procuring and advising •about medical evidence upon the probate of a will which wag contested by defendant, on the ground of the mental incapacity of the testator. The employment was denied by defendant, and the referee found in his favor, upon testimony held by this court, after a full and careful analysis thereof, to be sufficient to sustain the finding
J. L. Bennett for appellant.
Scott Lord for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.