Contracts · MBE-tested
SCOTT et al. v. CAREW et al.
121 F. 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SCOTT et al. v. CAREW et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 24, 1903.)
No. 1,160.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida.
Henry W. Anderson, Francis P. Fleming, and Francis P. Fleming, Jr., for appellants.
Wm. Wade Hampton, E. R. Gunby, M. G. Gibbons, William Hunter, and H. Bisbee, for appellees.
Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
After a careful examination and consideration of the elaborate decisions of Mr. Secretary Noble, Mr. Secretary Smith, Mr. Secretary Bliss, and Judge Locke, all found in the transcript, and all adverse to the claims of the appellants, and a study of the very able briefs filed by eminent counsel, we are of opinion that the judge of the Circuit Court properly ruled in sustaining the demurrer to the complainants’, bill; and therefore the judgment appealed from is affirmed.