Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bartley Delaney, as Administrator of Richard Delaney, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Steinway Railway Company of Long Island City, Appellant, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
General
Bartley Delaney, as Administrator of Richard Delaney, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Steinway Railway Company of Long Island City, Appellant
153 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bartley Delaney, as Administrator of Richard Delaney, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Steinway Railway Company of Long Island City, Appellant.
Reported below, 8 App. Div. 619.
(Argued April 19, 1897;
decided May 4, 1897.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 30, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
The motion was made upon the ground that no question of law is presented for review, and that the Appellate Division has unanimously decided that the verdict is supported by the evidence.
Daniel Noble for motion.
Eugene L. Bushe opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.