Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaret Boyle et al., Respondents, v. Sabra Lawton et al., Appellants, 1889 — 114 N.Y. 630 · caselaw · US
Tax
Margaret Boyle et al., Respondents, v. Sabra Lawton et al., Appellants
114 N.Y. 630·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Boyle et al., Respondents, v. Sabra Lawton et al., Appellants.
(Submitted April 26, 1889;
decided May 3, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made the first Tuesday of January, 1886, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to set aside the taxation and allowance of' plaintiffs’ costs.
James G. Johnson for appellants.
Ansley & Davie for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting.
Order affirmed.