Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al. v. Dawson et al., 1955 — 350 U.S. 877 · caselaw · US
General
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al. v. Dawson et al.
350 U.S. 877·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 7, 1955.
No. 232.
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al. v. Dawson et al.
C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, Norman P. Ramsey, Deputy Attorney General, and Ambrose T. Hartman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants. Robert L. Carter, Thurgood Marshall and Jack Greenberg for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.