Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry H. Sias et al., as Administrators of Charles H. McKee, Deceased, Appellants, v. Rochester Railway Company, Respondent, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 567 · caselaw · US
General
Henry H. Sias et al., as Administrators of Charles H. McKee, Deceased, Appellants, v. Rochester Railway Company, Respondent
159 N.Y. 567·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry H. Sias et al., as Administrators of Charles H. McKee, Deceased, Appellants, v. Rochester Railway Company, Respondent.
Sias v. Rochester Railway Co., 18 App. Div. 506, appeal dismissed.
(Argued June 5, 1899;
decided June 13, 1899.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate-Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 25, 1897, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial, and granting a new trial
The motion was made upon the ground that it does not affirmatively appear that the Appellate Division has examined the facts.
Beckley <& Bissell for motion.
Purcell, Walher dk Burns opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs.