Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Riegler, Respondent, v. The Tribune Association, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 542 · caselaw · US
General
Charles Riegler, Respondent, v. The Tribune Association, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
167 N.Y. 542·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Riegler, Respondent, v. The Tribune Association, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
(Argued April 24, 1901:
decided May 10, 1901.)
Riegler v. Tribune Association, 40 App. Div. 324, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 20, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Hemry W. Sackett and Seldon Bacon for appellant.
Gilbert D. Lamb for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: O’Bbien, Babtlett, Mabtin, Yann, Landon and Cullen, JJ. Pabkeb, Ch. J., dissents, on the ground that Glennon was not acting within the course of his employment when he threw benzine out of the window in defiance of the express orders of his master.