General

PETER ALEGI vs. HARRY CORATTI

13 Conn. Supp. 184·Connecticut Superior Court·1945·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

PETER ALEGI vs. HARRY CORATTI Superior Court New Haven County File No. 64565 MEMORANDUM FILED JANUARY 25, 1945 Nathan A. Resnik, of New Haven, for the Plaintiff. Herman N. Horwitz, of New Haven, for the Defendant. [MAJORITY — WYNNE, J.] WYNNE, J. The defendant has exhibited the copy of the process served upon him and it appears that the same was not dated. This is the only defect and it is purely a circumstantial one. Otherwise service was timely and the return day proper. The omission of date on the writ and complaint would in no way prejudice the defendant. The body of the writ apprised him of the proper return day of the suit instituted against him. The plea in abatement is therefore overruled. The motion for an order of attachment is entirely formal and is granted.