Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Max L. FRIEDBERG and James B. Wilson, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1933 — 63 F.2d 1003 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Max L. FRIEDBERG and James B. Wilson, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
63 F.2d 1003·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Max L. FRIEDBERG and James B. Wilson, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6707.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 20, 1933.
Ion L. Farris, of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellants.
W. P. Hughes, U. S. Atty., and Wm. A. Paisley, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Jacksonville, Fla.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
Rehearing denied May 6, 1933.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The extraordinary motion for leave to apply to the District Court for a new trial is denied. Realty Acceptance Corporation v. Montgomery, 284 U. S. 547, 52 S. Ct. 215, 76 L. Ed. 476.
The judgment is affirmed.