General
Catherine M. Stott, Respondent, v. Addison J. Churchill et al., Appellants
157 N.Y. 692·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catherine M. Stott, Respondent, v. Addison J. Churchill et al., Appellants.
Stott v. OhurcliiU, lo Misc. Rep. 80, affirmed.
(Argued October 14, 1898;
decided November 22, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the late Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered December 31, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Thomas S. Moore and Herbert G. Smyth for appellants.
John A. Dutton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.