Contracts · MBE-tested
GLASS v. CUMMING. In re CADIGAN, NIXON & CO.
63 F.2d 393·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GLASS v. CUMMING. In re CADIGAN, NIXON & CO.
No. 4997.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Feb. 6, 1933.
Gervaise G. Martin, of Franklin, Pa., for appellant.
Eugene Mackey, of Franklin, Pa., and Edmund C. Breene and Alexander B. Jobson, both of Oil City, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
An earlier phase of this ease was before' this court [see 39 F.(2d) 1022]. The pres-, ent one is fully set forth in the opinion of the court below.
After argument and full consideration, we are of opinion Judge Sehoonmaker made no error in his reasoning or conclusion. His opinion is so satisfactory that we adopt it as expressive of the views of this court and limit ourselves to affirming the decree based thereon.