Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LUCAS et al. v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., 1964 — 378 U.S. 555 · caselaw · US
General
LUCAS et al. v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.
378 U.S. 555·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LUCAS et al. v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.
No. 559.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Releford McGriff for appellants.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, Edward S. Jaffry and Joseph C. Jacobs, Assistant Attorneys General, and Wilton R. Miller, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.