Corporations
Maggie A. Coleman et al., Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent
173 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Maggie A. Coleman et al., Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent.
Coleman v. City of New York, 70 App. Div. 218, affirmed.
(Argued January 7, 1903;
decided January 27, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 3, 1902, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial.
Louis O. Van Doren for appellants.
George L. Rives, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant upon the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ.