Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Powell v. The Washington Post Co. et al., 1959 — 360 U.S. 930 · caselaw · US
General
Powell v. The Washington Post Co. et al.
360 U.S. 930·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 937.
Powell v. The Washington Post Co. et al.
Diana K. Powell, petitionér, pro se. George Blow for The Washington Post Company, and Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Samuel D. Slade and Stuart Rothman for the Secretary of Labor, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.