General
Gustavus Isaacs, Respondent, v. James B. Smith et al., Appellants
120 N.Y. 664·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gustavus Isaacs, Respondent, v. James B. Smith et al., Appellants.
(Argued June 12, 1890;
decided June 27, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the City of New York, entered upon an order made April 9, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Jacob F. Miller for appellants.
Gershom A. Seims for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.