Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Capital National Bank of Lincoln v. Coldwater National Bank; Capital National Bank of Lincoln v. Coldwater National Bank; McDonald v. Samuel Cupples Wooden Ware Company; McDonald v. Genesee Fruit Company, 1899 — 172 U.S. 434 · caselaw · US
General
Capital National Bank of Lincoln v. Coldwater National Bank; Capital National Bank of Lincoln v. Coldwater National Bank; McDonald v. Samuel Cupples Wooden Ware Company; McDonald v. Genesee Fruit Company
172 U.S. 4341899 U.S. LEXIS 1387·Supreme Court of the United States·1899
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Capital National Bank of Lincoln v. Coldwater National Bank. Capital National Bank of Lincoln v. Coldwater National Bank. McDonald v. Samuel Cupples Wooden Ware Company. McDonald v. Genesee Fruit Company.
Nos. 73, 74, 75, 76.
[MAJORITY — Tiie Chief Justice:]
Tiie Chief Justice:
Eor the reasons given in the opinion in Capital National Bank v. First National Bank of Cadiz, just decided, ante, 425, the writs of error in these cases are severally
Dismissed.