Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ILLINOIS BANKERS' LIFE ASSOCIATION et al., Appellants, v. William M. FARRIS et al., Appellees, 1927 — 21 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
General
ILLINOIS BANKERS' LIFE ASSOCIATION et al., Appellants, v. William M. FARRIS et al., Appellees
21 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ILLINOIS BANKERS’ LIFE ASSOCIATION et al., Appellants, v. William M. FARRIS et al., Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
March 30, 1927.
Rehearing Denied October 4, 1927.
No. 3737.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for tbe Northern Division of tbe Southern District of Illinois.
Hugh T. Martin, Ralph P. Potter, and L. A. Stebbins, all of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Claude U. Stone, of Peoria, Ill., and Orla M. Hill, and Jesse L. England, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.
Before EVANS, PAGE, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon tbe jurisdictional question as to tbe amount involved, we are of tbe opinion that this ease is not distinguishable from the cases of Wood et al. v. Thompson et al., and Illinois Bankers’ Life Association et al. v. Strattan et al., 14 F.(2d) 951, decided by this court June 9, 1926. Upon the authority of those cases tbe decree appealed from is reversed, with direction to dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction.