Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Layton et al. v. Selb Manufacturing Co. et al.; Miller v. Udall, Secretary of the Interior; Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United States et al.; Badgley et al. v. Hare, Secretary of State of Michigan, et al.; Devers v. Capital Investors Co. et al.; Izzi v. Rezzolla et al.; Driscoll v. Toledo Blade Co.; Hiatt v. San Francisco National Bank et al.; Fortson, Secretary of State of Georgia v. Morris et al.; Guy v. Tahash, Warden, et al.; Morford v. Fogliani, Warden; Bailey v. Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc.; Bandy v. United States Attorney General; Gemmel v. Buchkoe, Warden; Jones v. Mancusi, Warden; Boyden v. United States; Hilliard v. Texas; Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro; Oosterwyk v. County of Milwaukee et al., 1967 — 385 U.S. 1021 · caselaw · US