General
FRENZER v. WALLACE; MORSMAN v. SAME; McCLELLAN v. SAME
201 U.S. 24450 L. Ed. 742·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FRENZER v. WALLACE. MORSMAN v. SAME. McCLELLAN v. SAME.
APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Nos. 192, 193, 195.
Submitted March 6, 1906.
Decided April 2, 1906.
Decided on authority of Wyman v. Wallace, ante, p. 230.
Mr. W. W. Morsman and Mr. Howard B. Smith for appellants in Nos. 192 and T93. Mr. ’Charles Battelle and Mr. Bichard S. Horton for appellants in No. 195.
Mr. James M. Woolworth and Mr. B. S. Hall for appellees.
For abstracts of briefs see Wyman v. Wallace, ante, p. 230.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Brewer:]
Mr. Justice Brewer:
These are separate appeals by other stockholders from the.same decree, and'present no questions other than those considered in the former opinion, and the same decrees of affirmance will be entered.