General
Frank J. Rossi, Plaintiff, v. Marmon Enterprises, Inc., Respondent, and Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., Appellant
277 A.D.2d 440715 N.Y.S.2d 892·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2000·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank J. Rossi, Plaintiff, v Marmon Enterprises, Inc., Respondent, and Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., Appellant.
[715 NYS2d 892]
[MAJORITY]
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated January 10, 2000, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on its cross claim against the defendant Marmon Enterprises, Inc.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the motion of Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., which was for summary judgment on its cross claim (see, Putnam v Stout, 38 NY2d 607, 612; Zito v 241 Church St. Corp., 223 AD2d 353, 355; Farrar v Teicholz, 173 AD2d 674). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.