Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nevada and New York v. Stacher, 1953 — 346 U.S. 906 · caselaw · US
General
Nevada and New York v. Stacher
346 U.S. 90674 S. Ct. 236·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 61.
Nevada and New York v. Stacher.
Argued November 12, 1953.
Decided December 7, 1953.
Jack Streeter, Special Assistant Attorney General of Nevada, and Paul W. Williams, Special Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief were William T. Matthews, Attorney General, and George M. Dickerson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Nevada, and Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney General, Wendell P. Brown, Solicitor General, and Edward L. Ryan, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New York. Lemuel B. Schofield filed an appearance for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Cer-tiorari, 345 U. S. 991, to the Seventh Judicial District Court of Nevada, in and for the County of White Pine.
Per Curiam:
Judgment reversed. Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police, 245 U. S. 128; Pierce v. Creecy, 210 U. S. 387.