Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William L. Andrews, Respondent, v. Richard W. G. Welling, as Assignee, etc., Appellant, et al., Respondents, 1897 — 152 N.Y. 639 · caselaw · US
General
William L. Andrews, Respondent, v. Richard W. G. Welling, as Assignee, etc., Appellant, et al., Respondents
152 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William L. Andrews, Respondent, v. Richard W. G. Welling, as Assignee, etc., Appellant, et al., Respondents.
Andrews v. Welling, 84 Hun, 40, affirmed.
(Argued March 8, 1897;
decided March 23, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 25, 1895, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee and granted a new trial.
John L. Wilkie and Everett V. Abbot for appellant.
Alfred J. Taylor for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for the plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs.
All concur, except Gray, J., not voting.