General
In the Matter of the Application of E. S. POTTER for Writ of Habeas Corpus
19 Cal. App. 500·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1912·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Crim. No. 250.
Second Appellate District.
July 19, 1912.]
In the Matter of the Application of E. S. POTTER for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Habeas Corpus—Failure of Justices of Appellate Court to Agree— Remand of Petitioner.—Upon the hearing of an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the appellate court, where the justices of such court are unable to agree upon a decision of the questions involved in the proceeding, the petitioner must be remanded to the custody of the proper officer.
APPLICATION for writ of habeas corpus to the Chief of Police of the city of Los Angeles.
The ground of decision is stated by the court.
Parker & Moote, for Petitioner.
John D. Fredericks, District Attorney, Guy Eddie, City Prosecutor, Frank W. Stafford, Assistant City Prosecutor, and L. H. Roseberry, Special Prosecutor, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
The justices of this court being unable to agree upon a decision of the questions involved in this proceeding, it follows that the petitioner must be remanded to the custody of the chief of police of Los Angeles city, and it is so ordered.