Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Moses May, Respondent, v. Louis M. Jones et al., Appellants, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 577 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Moses May, Respondent, v. Louis M. Jones et al., Appellants
185 N.Y. 577·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Moses May, Respondent, v. Louis M. Jones et al., Appellants.
May v. Jones, 103 App. Div. 617, affirmed.
(Argued May 15, 1906;
decided June 5, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 15, 1905, affirming a judgmént in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover a sum theretofore paid by plaintiff upon a contract whereby defendants agreed to sell a certain leasehold estate, together with damages for alleged fraudulent representations.
Edwin Countryman for appellants.
Ira Leo Bamberger and Sidney Lowenthal for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Gray, J,