Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Devers v. District of Columbia National Bank; Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. Figueroa de Arroyo et al.; United States et al. v. City of Chicago et al.; United States et al. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission et al.; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission et al.; Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad et al. v. City of Chicago et al.; Dawson v. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare; Taglia v. Laird, Secretary of Defense; Johnson v. State Bar of California et al.; Sturm v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Gay v. United States; Orme v. Field, Men's Colony Superintendent, et al., 1970 — 400 U.S. 953 · caselaw · US