General

Jane Doe et al., Appellants, v. HMO-CNY et al., Respondents.

14 A.D.3d 110784 N.Y.S.2d 465·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2004·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[784 NYS2d 465] Jane Doe et al., Appellants, v HMO-CNY et al., Respondents. (Appeal No. 2.) Fourth Department, November 19, 2004 APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL Sullivan Oliverio & Gioia LLP, Buffalo (B.P. Oliverio of counsel), for appellants. Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (John G. McGowan of counsel), for respondent. [MAJORITY — Hurlbutt, J.] OPINION OF THE COURT Hurlbutt, J. Same opinion by Hurlbutt, J., as in Doe v HMO-CNY (14 AD3d 102 [2004]). Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine and Scudder, JJ., concur. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.