General

GEO. A. CLOUGH et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TEHAMA COUNTY et al., Respondents

19 Cal. App. 2d 745·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1937·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[Civ. No. 5733. Third Appellate District. March 9, 1937.] GEO. A. CLOUGH et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TEHAMA COUNTY et al., Respondents. Pugh & Pugh and George A. Clough for Petitioners. Clarence W. Morris for Respondents. [MAJORITY — THE COURT.] THE COURT. Motion to strike out petitioners’ cost bill filed in original proceedings in mandamus. The judgment in this cause did not award costs to the petitioners. On the authority of Gould v. Moss, 158 Cal. 548 [111 Pac. 925], the respondents’ motion to strike out petitioners’ cost bill is granted.