General
Harold Kessler et al., Respondents, v. City of New York, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Empire City Subway Co. (Limited), Third-Party Defendant-Respondent and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Tri-Messine Construction Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent
118 A.D.2d 446·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1986·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harold Kessler et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Empire City Subway Co. (Limited), Third-Party Defendant-Respondent and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Tri-Messine Construction Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Reuben Davis, J.), entered on March 29, 1985, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and the orders of said court, entered on or about March 8, 1985 and on or about March 13, 1985, respectively, unanimously dismissed, as abandoned, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur —Sandler, J. P., Ross, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.