Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Michael Mulligan, Appellant, v. John D. Crimmins, Respondent, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 594 · caselaw · US
General
Michael Mulligan, Appellant, v. John D. Crimmins, Respondent
149 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael Mulligan, Appellant, v. John D. Crimmins, Respondent.
Mulligan v. Crimmins, 75 Hun, 578, affirmed.
(Argued April 27, 1896;
decided May 26, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered ■upon an order made February 12, 1894, which overruled plaintiff’s exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance at General Term and directed judgment for defendant dismissing the complaint upon the merits.
Henry A. Monfort for appellant.
Thomas S. Moore and Charles C. Nadal for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.