General
Mabel L. Shaw et al., Doing Business as Shaw's General Store, Respondents, v. Home Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al., Appellants
285 A.D. 1015·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1955·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mabel L. Shaw et al., Doing Business as Shaw's General Store, Respondents, v. Home Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Vaughan, J. P., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial on the ground that the jury failed to find the value of the loss to the damaged property. (Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga Trial Term for plaintiffs in an action under a fire insurance policy.) Present - Vaughan, J. P., Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.