General
O'Daily v. The State
9 Ind. 494·Supreme Court of Indiana·1857·IN
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O’Daily v. The State.
Friday, November 27.
APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Court of Common Pleas.
Prosecution under the liquor law of 1855.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
A majority of the Court sitting at the present term, regarding the liquor act of 1855 as void, hold the judgment in this case erroneous. The judgment must be reversed, and the information should be quashed .
W. C. Wilson, S. A. Huff\ G. O. Behm, and G. Gardner, for the appellant.
See Beebe v. The State, 6 Ind. R. 501. Porter v. The State, on appeal from the Common Pleas of Tippecanoe, and Longnesser v. The State, on appeal from the Spencer Common Pleas, were cases of the same kind, and were this day reversed for the reasons given above.