General
Otto H. Droege, as Receiver of the Property of Isidor Henry, Appellant, v. Edwin W. Baxter et al., Respondents
171 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Otto H. Droege, as Receiver of the Property of Isidor Henry, Appellant, v. Edwin W. Baxter et al., Respondents.
Droege v. Baxter, 69 App. Div. 88, affirmed.
(Argued May 5, 1902;
decided May 20, 1902.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 21, 1902, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint and sustained such demurrer.
The following is the question certified: “ Does the complaint herein state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant herein ? ”
Otto H. Droege and Isaac V. Schavrien for appellant.
William J. Barr for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ.