General
Etta L. Alexander, Appellant, v. The Rochester City and Brighton Railroad Company, Respondent
144 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Etta L. Alexander, Appellant, v. The Rochester City and Brighton Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued October 31, 1894;
decided November 27, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made June 23, 1893, which denied a motion for a new trial and ordered judgment in favor of defendant upon the nonsuit directed hy the court on trial at Circuit.
B. Chamberlain, Jr., for appellant.
Theodore Bacon for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Peokham, J., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.